 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
(via -
Android Tapp ) I read it on 03/02/10 at 08:50 AM
Posted on 03/02/10 at 01:31 PM
|
Now that AT&T has joined the Android revolution, the first question new Android users will ask is what Android apps should I download? Luckily we've created a simple guide to get you started:
First we'll start with the operating system version of the Motorola Backflip at launch, which is version 1.5 the latest and greatest to date is 2.1 (with majority of users on 1.6). This may affect your ability to download some apps as they are compatible with higher versions of the OS. Why is the OS version so out of date? Motoblur Motorola tricked out the software for social networking ease however they have not released Motoblur on the latest and greatest Android OS. Don't fret an update is coming soon.
Now that we're over the OS hump, we'll recommend some of the best Android apps for your Motorola Backflip many for free!
 Browse and Search files on your SD Card and phone with Astro File Manager.
 Close individual or all apps and background services with Advanced Task Killer.
 Meridian Player for Music & Videos.
 Dolphin Browser allows you to browse the web using Tabs and create shortcuts using Gestures.
 Handcent SMS offers text messaging like on iPhone, get T9 text capabilities and text signatures.
 Shazam... simply awesome! Get any song by simply letting your phone listen to it!
 i Music & i Music Tao allows you to download free MP3s.
 Stream music for free with Pandora Internet Radio.
 Turn your AT&T Backflip into a media remote with Gmote and even control your computer via phone!
 Scan bar codes of products in stores to find best pricing nearby or online with ShopSavvy.
 Photo scan products to get pricing and details with Google's Shopper
 Aloqa location-based app finds places nearby you versus you searching for it.
 Abduction! Is an additive game using your phone's accelerometer.
 Robo Defense is a classic tower defense game for Android phones.
 Check out parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Mystique 3D horror puzzle game series.
 Like words games? Try Wuzzle for hours of fun!
 Kill time with addictive Jewellust game
 You can't forget a classic time-killer like Solitaire.
 Guess what others are drawing while they guess your drawing all online with What The Doodle!?
 Satisfy your Vegas crave with Blackjack Pro!
If you download all these apps you might run out of space on your Backflip! Do check these apps out and tell us what you think in the comments.

Tags: android apps backflip music download
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
www.1938media.com ) I read it on 02/06/10 at 01:54 PM
Posted on 02/06/10 at 06:52 PM
|
My Thoughts On Techcrunch And Daniel Brusilovsky
This was going to be a video, but frankly I'm too upset and I don't want my sentiments to be lost while you stare at my good looks and get hypnotized by my command of language and performance.
We are at a crossroads on the web and social media. It's time to start looking at ourselves with an honest eye. Today's topic is journalism and transparency.
I'm in no way a journalist but here's my transparency. I had a falling out last year with ManCrunch founder Michael Arrington. I honestly adored him, and would vigorously defend his general dickish and insane behavior to anyone who ever asked which was essentially everyone. I would say Mike is just like me, you just don't get his humor. I would do anything for him, he's been great to me.
Then Mike called to cancel his speaking appearance at The Audience Conference. Yeah I was in the car driving to the event when he called, but I tried to laugh it off. I knew all along he was gonna bail, and frankly being a friend and knowing that Mike can be Mike I really didn't care and was willing to let it slide, even though this was the second time he screwed up. He apologized the first time and we were cool. The second time he wrote some silly post on ManCrunchNotes about friendship and puppies. I like dogs too and considered the matter closed.
Then I watched him do the same thing, only worse and at a much larger scale, to another friend of mine. And then another. Then I heard some other stuff, which everyone else is mumbling about. Then I thought back to the way he treats his staff and realized that even though it makes for great puppet videos that nobody watches, It's just not my style to hang with a guy like that.
But that was months ago. My thoughts about TechCrunch in this post are not part of some revenge plot between an internet puppeteer who gets a few hundred views per YouTube video and a bigtime lawyer who claims millions of readers yet only generates a few dozen clicks each of the 20 times I've been on the front page of his site.
Daniel Brusilovsky, the latest character in the sad tale of TechCrunch, is 17 years old. Excluding Mike's puppy, this makes him the youngest contributor to the site.
Other TechCrunch contributors include Sarah Lacy, who earned her chops getting laughed off the stage interviewing Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and fellow auteur Paul Carr, who documented his unethical behaviors in a book you can download for free on TechCrunch. Paul's other hobbies include Foursquare checkins, and delaying writing the words he's under contract to write.
One of Sarah's more popular TechCrunch posts was talking about a juice diet product that costs $95 per day, which she totally paid for herself, which may or may not be repped by people close to Mike and companies that Mike invested in. Paul Carr tried it too. Even Mike gave the juice a go, or at least the puppet did I forget. Sarah also travels a lot which you can tell by the deep international flavor of her TechCrunch coverage and analysis. Or at least the pictures she posts on other sites.
There are other people at TechCrunch that I dig. I'm still mad that Hendrickson left because that threw off my puppet gag. And Schoenfeld did a great job filling in as master of ceremonies for Mike after Mike threw a tantrum and disappeared three hours before his own award show. I did a quick Google and he didn't call Arrington a total jackass even once for it. So props for that. There are others too but I'll spare them Mike's wrath by not mentioning them.
Bringing up the rear is Steve Gillmor who is the oldest TechCrunch employee at 157 years old. He's basically known for his unique talent for speaking in tongues. Tech style y'all. Yesterday Steve broadcast himself screaming at his assistant while being unable to use the copycat audio/video technology he bought for himself to compete with Leo, after he uh, left Leo's network amicably.
Since you haven't heard about Gillmor Gang let me tell you what it is.
The Gillmor Gang may or may not be a TechCrunch production. It consists of non-technical people yelling at each other about technology and runs for what feels like eleven hours. Visuals focus on odd angles of nostril hair, bad cell phone call-in audio, and lighting that makes them look like lizards. Their most popular video is a 90 second YouTube clip where keyboard cat plays jazz organ after Mike acts like an idiot, a Google employee throws his Skype headset down in disgust, and I roll my eyes uncomfortably.
This four screen picture-in-picture view was made possible by Leo's mastery of the tech that Gillmor still hasn't figured out how to use. You probably won't be able to find the site in Google since it changes URLs every ten minutes but you can probably find the keyboard cat clip on YouTube. If you bump into Leo Laporte, don't mention that you've seen it.
Unofficial TechCrunch employees include Robert Scoble, ex-camera salesman and Microsoft Vista evangelist. Today Scoble is again throwing around his journalism credentials (he dropped out of j-school) in defense of Daniel and Mike. I'll just point out that if you have to constantly tell people you're a journalist, there might be something lacking from your body of work. Even in this jaded age people tend to be able to smell actual reporting and it's not coming from building 43 at the Rackspace headquarters. Although it was fun to watch the Rackspace head of social media flop around on Friendfeed after the latest Gillmor Gang episode blew up. Cool site that Friendfeed. Somebody big should buy it and really fix up that community. And way to pick a winner in Scoble, Rackspace. Haven't seen a play this brilliant since you screwed up Slicehost.
But back to reporting. Closest Scoble ever got to a story was interviewing the guy who sells yogurt to Steve Jobs. Scoble reported that Steve Jobs was in great health. Jobs left Apple four days later for a liver transplant. Scoble was also on the private jet the day John Edwards announced his run for the Presidency, shooting video three feet away from the other video blogger who was John Edwards mistress and who mothered his child. Didn't pick up on that vibe either I guess. He sure has his thumb on the pulse.
So on the one hand I want to give Daniel Brusilovsky a pass. The kid is 17 and look at the environment he's working in and the idiots he's surrounded by. I'm tempted to blame the parents, but hey, there's no way they'd know this stuff.
Let's pretend for a moment that Dan is not some privileged little schmuck and that his parents aren't connected to Silicon Valley in some convenient way for Mike and/or Scoble. Let's imagine that the parents actually performed due diligence and took five minutes to Google the people their kid would be spending time with.
Wow. Well-adjusted, social, popular people. With lots of friends. And friendly Wikipedia entries. And they all love tech!
We all know this is utter bullshit. This is the world we've created on the web.
So before you yell at Dan, look at yourself. I know personally that lots of you know lots of things and you don't say the Stuff That Matters.
It's okay to call people idiots, or dopes, or morons, or liars when they are. This is part of the process of transparency.
Although it's probably not that helpful, you can even get away with being mean for no good reason. Here goes. Robert Scoble really is fucking stupid. Every smart person I know thinks so. Shel Israel really is a nasty prick. If you've actually tried to work with him, you know this. See? The internet didn't just collapse.
And yeah, TechCrunch has become a joke.
It's okay to say this stuff. In fact we have to say this stuff if we want to improve. You'll badmouth a restaurant for lukewarm fries on Yelp but you won't say that Rackspace Spokesman Scoble is a fool for thinking a VPN is a Virtual Public Network? One time is a slip of the tongue and we all make mistakes, but this guy has been on the wrong side of history going back a decade and clearly doesn't know anything.
It's also okay to promote other people who do great work. I don't care if it's Follow Friday or Tumblr Tuesday or ManCrunch Monday, take a minute next time and really find and promote Someone Who Matters. And if you can't find that someone, perhaps reflect on the web of connections you built and why you're wasting your time with them. Let alone endorsing them by keeping them in that little grid of profile pictures you're so proud of.
So yeah, I want to give Dan Brusilovsky a pass given the entire environment. But I can't.
I've met him several times and thought he was a smug little prick. Some kids are kids, some adults like Mike are kids, and some 17 year old kids know exactly what's up. My opinion is that Dan is a Man and falls into the last category. He knew what he was doing and deserves the consequences.
Should Mike have done a better job mentoring him? Absolutely. But look at Mike. He can't take care of himself in any way or even show up to the parties and conference circle jerks he throws himself. He seems to do an okay job with the puppies but I wouldn't trust him with an up-and-coming 17 year old tech reporter.
Mike's transparency post also deserves a little attention. It says nothing. It doesn't mention the company or companies involved in the alleged laptop-for-coverage scandal. I'm sure it'll all get figured out eventually, and it might even be a company that's a friend or sponsor of mine. But in the spirit of saying Stuff That Matters, I'll close with this:
If you bought a MacBook Air in order to get a 17 year old to write a post on TechCrunch, and you thought this would in any way improve your business, you're an absolute, total dope.
Tags: mike techcrunch scoble even video
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
TechStartups.com ) I read it on 10/28/09 at 01:32 PM
Posted on 10/27/09 at 05:21 PM
|
By Senior Editor Kris Smith (@croncast)
. . . nor should you.
I mean it.
And as far an unconferences go, WordCamps PodCamps, Ignites, TechMeetups or Hack Days haven't been that different from other paid conferences that I have attended; hit and miss, but mostly miss because the organizers are high on a sugar buzz.
What are the two things that make them hit or miss? They be:
1) Unprepared speakers
2) Awesome hallway conversations
The only way to have an unconference that gets people excited about coming back again or speaking about the event is to manage number 1 above. Unconference organizers shouldn't take candy from strangers and let them ruin the experience. Sure the suckers are tasty but while you're indulging on the sweets of filling the slots with people, the attendees are stuck with a sour experience. Bring that hallway enthusiasm to the stage in the form of raw, uncut sugar.
Unconference organizers should be in contact with their speakers dialoging about how to make their event useful to attendees, memorable, something that makes an impact in their daily lives. Nobody wants to sit and listen to what are essentially product diatribes or be spoken to like they are children.
How to save your unconference:
1) Plan, plan and plan some more. Plan everything and have a plan for it your plan doesn't work (because it is an unconference doesn't mean that attendee expectations are lower when they walk through the door than they would be for the $1000 conference that you bemoan)
2) Tell your speakers to get prepared (this is a golden opportunity to share experiences that can help people not make the same mistakes)
3) Create attendee tracks (create unconference value by allowing a channel for filtered conversations a.k.a. hallway conversations)
This post might not come off like it, but I am a big fan of unconferences. However, I am beginning to think that the best conferences might be a mix of the traditional and the new step-child.
Viva unconference.
DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL CONNECTION: http://cmp.ly/0
Unconference Organizers Shouldn't Take Candy From Strangers is a post from: TechStartups.com
Tags: candy bar , Gnomedex , ignite , podcamp , publicmediacamp , unconference , uncut raw sugar , wordcamp 
Tags: unconference plan organizers candy conversations
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Firedoglake ) I read it on 09/28/09 at 06:24 PM
Posted on 09/28/09 at 09:30 PM
|
I only wish I were kidding here, folks. From JLFinch at Daily Kos and Wonkette, we find out that Dan Riehl is pulling a Peggy Noonan It-Is-Irresponsible-Not-To-Speculate smear job on a dead guy who can't fight back:
Was Census Worker Bill Sparkman A Child Predator?
Update: Before any more people start going bonkers that I'm accusing Sparkman of anything, take a breath. ... . ...All I'm doing is looking at any and all possibilities. ... Why strip him naked and bind and gag him, which has serious sexual overtones?
I have no idea what happened, but from the reporting I've seen, neither does anyone else. If he adopted a boy as a single man, or was married and split with the wife and kids, who knows. But I never assume I know a story or motive until I know it. Right now we don't. I'm simply speculating on one possible alternative, however impolite.
Well, golly, Mr. Riehl, I'm sure Mr. Sparkman's wife and son must really enjoy your coy little efforts to smear their tortured-to-death husband and father:
"We are deeply saddened by the loss of our co-worker," Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said in a statement. "Our thoughts and prayers are with William Sparkman's son, other family and friends."
Gee, how would Dan Riehl like it if we asked, without any evidence to back up our questioning, if Dan Riehl had raped and murdered any little boys? I suspect he wouldn't like it at all.
But of course, this isn't the first time Riehl's been deeply amoral and stupid in public. It isn't even the first time this month. That's just par for the course with him.
Tags: riehl sparkman dan worker son
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
ksmith at filome created the group "AA - Taminania Science" | www.filome.com ) I read it on 09/27/09 at 02:18 PM
Posted on 09/27/09 at 05:48 PM
|
Publisher - World of Psychology First shared by - tamihania syndication+ 0 | Search 1 | Shares 1
Most of us are generally aware that television isn't the healthiest of activities. Yet, like cigarette smoking in the 1970s, it's one of those harms we continue to whitewash or worse exposing our children to it as though it were as innocent as playing with Tinkertoys.
Yet as today's Boston Globe reminds us, TV is not this passive device you sit your children in front of with no ill effects. Decades worth of research have shown the harmful effects of TV on your child's development. Most child psychologists and child development experts recommend no TV whatsoever for a child before the age of 2 or 3. None. Yet a whopping 43 percent of parents plop their toddler down in front of the television set, apparently blind to the consequence of their actions.
But don't take my word for it. Look at the research:
Countless studies have documented the inverse link between devotion to the boob tube and achievement in school. Researchers at Columbia's College of Physicians and Surgeons concluded in 2007, for example, that 14-year-olds who watched one or more hours of television daily were at elevated risk for poor homework completion, negative attitudes toward school, poor grades, and long-term academic failure.'' Those who watched three or more hours a day were at even greater risk for subsequent attention and learning difficulties,'' and were the least likely to go to college.
In 2005, a study published in the American Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine found that the harm caused by TV watching shows up even after correcting the data to account for students' intelligence, family conditions, and prior behavioral problems. The bottom line: Increased time spent watching television during childhood and adolescence was associated with a lower level of educational attainment by early adulthood.''
The baleful effects of TV aren't limited to education. The University of Michigan Health System notes on its extensive website that kids who watch TV are more likely to smoke, to be overweight, to suffer from sleep difficulties, and to have high cholesterol.
There are also the studies that show that teens who watch more sexual content on TV are twice as likely to be involved in a pregnancy over the next three years than their peers. Imagine an illicit drug was resulting in twice the amount of teen pregnancies and how quickly parents would be an uproar to stop the peddling of that drug in their neighborhood.
Ah, but you argue, I grew up on TV and I came out okay! Sure, personal anecdotes and analogies are great, but not a great way to inform public policy or carry on a serious public health debate. What works for a single individual at a single point of time in a single household doesn't carry the same weight as a scientific study that examines data across families and neighborhoods, studies that were carried out over time and with attention to possible alternative explanations (such as the fact that maybe in your household, TV time was more strictly limited than you remember, or the content in the programs themselves was very different than today's content).
The upshot we Americans watch way too much TV and we raise our children on TV, somewhat oblivious to its negative effects on our children's development. While TV isn't evil, it is a powerful media that has a well-understood impact on a child's or teen's development. Like the Internet, it should be allowed with clear rules and conditions, and time doing it should be monitored and limited. What the right number for you and your family will vary, but it should not be whenever they want and as much as they want.
Read the full article: Silence that idiot box!
tv children child effects television
Tags: tv children effects child television
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
ksmith at filome created the group "AA - Taminania Science" | www.filome.com ) I read it on 09/27/09 at 08:24 PM
Posted on 09/27/09 at 05:40 PM
|
Publisher - Readtwit First shared by - tamihania syndication+ 1 | Search 1 | Shares 1
@twitterbo wrote:
Protect little eyes from the computer screen ... http://short.to/r4zc
Protect little eyes from the computer screen
With September comes the resumption of school work, homework, research projects and classmate communication, so it's important to note that the average North American child now spends one to three hours per day with his or her eyes on a computer screen. As a result, many leading pediatric eye doctors believe that the startling increase of nearsightedness (myopia) in children worldwide is a direct consequence of avid computer use.
In fact, children using computers before their visual systems are fully developed are at the very heart of the public health problem called computer vision syndrome', says Bijan Minbashion, vice president of operations for Hakim Optical, retail eye care specialists. A study at the University of California reports that 25 to 30 percent of computer-using children need corrective eyewear to work with the equipment comfortably and safely and similar studies in Asia report that first-graders with myopia has increased from 12.1 to 20.4 percent since 1995. In the last three years, myopia is reported to have doubled to 34 percent in seven- to nine-year-olds.
To guard against early damage to your child's eyes, consider these tips: Schedule a comprehensive eye exam as your child enters kindergarten, including near-point (computer and reading) and distance testing. Schedule an eye exam before school begins every year. The recommended distance for children between the monitor and the eye is 18-28 inches. Any closer risks eye strain. Be aware of behaviour that indicates problems such as eye redness, frequent rubbing of the eyes, unusual posture, or complaints of blurriness or eye fatigue. News Canada
|
|
eye computer eyes children screen
Tags: eye computer eyes children screen
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Wired: Epicenter ) I read it on 08/23/09 at 11:22 AM
Posted on 08/23/09 at 02:53 PM
|
When you think of a hard-core gamer, do you picture a teenage boy battling his friends in World of Warcraft?
Think again.
The average gamer, far from being a teen, is actually a 35-year-old man who is overweight, aggressive, introverted and often depressed, according to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (download PDF). The study also shows that when children and teenagers become game players, a trend toward physical inactivity and corresponding health problems extends and is exacerbated into adulthood.
Among researchers, there is growing concern and uncertainty about the health consequences of video game playing, the CDC reported. Given the ubiquity of video games industry estimates suggest that they are played in 65% of American households these concerns may be justified.
The study notes that half of gamers are between 18 and 49 years old, while 25% are 50 and older. The CDC also pointed out that of online gamers aged 8 to 34, nearly 12% showed multiple signs of addiction.
The study, based on a 2006 online survey of 552 people between the ages of 19 and 90 who were living in the Seattle-Tacoma area of Washington state, also shows differences between male and female gamers.
Men reported that gaming gives them a reason to get together, while women said they are looking more for a diversion than social interaction. Despite the fact that men and women offered differing reasons for playing, they experienced several of the same health effects.
Jim McGregor, an analyst at In-Stat, noted that his concern isn't just with gaming but with social networks, as well.
My issue is that it's not just gaming. It's social networking. It's the Web in general, said McGregor. We've gained so much, but still it puts people in front of a computer screen for hours on end. It gives Americans just another reason to be fat, dumb and lazy.
According to the CDC, both male and female gamers were more likely to report that they were overweight and had more poor-mental-health days and were less socially outgoing than non-gamers. Women were more apt to report that they experienced depression and other general health issues than women who aren't gamers. Male gamers, for their part, were more likely to report being obese.
One interpretation of these findings is that, among women, video-game playing may be a form of digital self-medication. In short, they can literally take their minds off their worries while playing a video game. noted the CDC. Among men, the association among sedentary behaviors, physical inactivity and overweight status observed in children and young adults may extend into adulthood.
Also on wired.com:
Tags: gamers cdc health game women
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Dave Made That : New Media Musings by Dave Delaney ) I read it on 07/27/09 at 09:26 AM
Posted on 07/27/09 at 03:15 AM
|

I had a fantastic time at my wife's family reunion this past weekend in East Tennessee.
Every year her family rents a cabin in the Smoky Mountains. Everyone comes from far and wide to reunite for a few days, to spend time cooking, eating, talking, swimming and chilling with each other.
When I got home tonight I was showing my son some photos from previous years. Last year he wasn't confident in the pool, the year before that he was just walking, before that he was just a baby and an only child.
Seeing my adolescent nieces and nephews made me think about how the time has passed between reunions, about how our children are growing up.
I was stunned this weekend with how much our nieces and nephews have grown, they are from 8 to 16 now. They are great kids, but they are no longer little children who I had grown accustomed to seeing there each year.
When I first started going to the reunions we didn't have kids yet. Now when I look at photos from just three years ago, those young relatives have really matured. They are teens and tweens now. As that age dictates, they are all about hanging out with each other instead of the adults. It's all about independence now.
We use to end each weekend with an improvised play by the kids. The shows always included a comedy segment, some dramatic scenes by the pool (pictured here) and finally a magic act. The show was always an endless example of how kids imaginations work. We adults would tire towards the end of the show, but we would always cheer and applaud like we were watching a Broadway musical.
My kids are 2 and 3, they aren't quite ready to perform a variety show yet. Parents always tell us how our kids will grow quickly, I never doubted this for a minute. I notice their growth all of the time, especially in pictures and videos.
What's sinking in is that their innocence will only remain fully intact for a few more years. Our children really are growing quickly, too quickly sometimes. When I see how fast our family has grown, I realize it's only going to occur faster with our own kids. Soon they will be performing the reunion variety show, soon after they will outgrow it.
We tend to get caught up so much in our professional lives that we sometimes miss the most important people in them. Shut your machine off, kill your phone, get out there and spend some time with your children while you have it.
Tags: kids children year grown years
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
The Lost Jacket ) I read it on 07/08/09 at 12:58 PM
Posted on 07/08/09 at 01:17 PM
|

Getting through to the 5-18 year old demographic is increasingly becoming more and more complicated. Parents are more vigilant, multiple channels exist, and most of us in social don't know where they hang out in the first place. (Here's a hint: it's mostly mobile and will continue to go in that direction.)
How can you break through and communicate/engage with the kids without being mistakenly harangued by Chris Hansen? Good question and I don't necessarily know if direct social engagement is the right place to grab their interest.
It comes back to a simple tenet: Add Value. How can you effectively add value for a teen? Talk about sensitive issues like P&G (Beinggirl.com)? Provide information about cool products and their customizable options (Lego City)? Or just be a fun place to hang out (I looked, but anything I put here will be outdated by the time this post goes live)?
The key will being able to get in front of the child/teen and engage them in a dialogue that is beneficial to them, supported by/parent friendly, and is not intrusive. Mobile opt-in is a good place to start here. However, you have to really break down what kind of information you are sending to kids.
Partnering with a popular television show, movie or toy would be the best place to start. This way you already have a built in audience. Most marketing campaigns to kids start and end at this point. Do you have to stop the conversation though? Or can you continue to add value to the audience that you gained over the course of your program. The answer? Yes.
This can't be a half-hearted attempt to change the dialogue. You really need someone that can nurture the community, provide leadership within, and push the community to action when needed.
Best way to do this with kids? Free anything.
Children and teens both have a desire to conform, be cool, and acquire massive amounts of free anything. To inspire a community: simply make them feel welcome, give them a voice, and provide them with cool stuff/schwag. (Yes, that's it.)
Have any other suggestions on how to effectively transform the marketing experience of kids/teens online? How can we effectively build communities that add value? Do you have any other examples?
Tags: kids add value effectively cool
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|