 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
(via -
Epicenter ) I read it on 12/04/08 at 03:56 PM
Posted on 12/04/08 at 07:36 PM
|
Boxee.tv has become a great one-stop shop for organizing and finding streaming video online, and starting today the service is adding Netflix on-demand movies to its box of tricks. Unfortunately for AppleTV fans, who make up a fair bit of Boxee's fan base, the new Netflix features won't work with the Apple TV version just yet.
A note on Boxee blog blames the underpowered Apple TV processor, which just can't handle the demands of Microsoft Silverlight (the platform which Netflix uses to stream videos). But Boxee says it's still working on a solution, so there might be hope for Netflix on the Apple TV yet.
Apple TV users aren't the only ones missing out on Boxee. At the moment Boxeee is limited to Mac and Linux users, but that will be changing soon. Along with the new Netflix features, Boxee has announced a Windows version which has been seeded to a few hundred users. So far there's no word on when a Windows version might arrive, but at least you can rest assured that it is indeed in the works.
In the mean time the new Boxee Netflix features will work just fine on a regular Mac and the update has enough other new features to make it well worth the upgrade. Among the standouts in the latest release are much better Hulu.com support -- you can now login to get your Hulu queue, and playback is much faster -- and some improvements to the YouTube portion of Boxee as well.
The new Boxee YouTube plugin supports the new higher quality videos (where available), which reportedly look pretty good even on that 52" plasma you just dropped a paycheck on.
Other new goodies in the latest version of Boxee include improved plugins for content from CNN, Flickr, Picasa and Apple Movie Trailers, which should all be a bit snappier. There's also new support for the Boston Globe's The Big Picture blog, which makes it easy to get the hi-res photos from the The Big Picture onto your TV.
[Update: I spoke with Boxee CEO Avner Ronen about the Windows version of Boxee and he says that Windows Media Center-capable Boxee is definitely on the roadmap and there's a possibility that Boxee might find a home on XBox. Of course in the case of the XBox, the closed platform means that getting Boxee running would either require Microsoft to open up the XBox or a hack of some kind.
Ronen was also optimistic about getting more content into a Boxee. For instance, the oft-requested HBO integration isn't possible right now because HBO doesn't offer its shows online. But Ronen believes that the HBOs and other holdouts from the world of online video will eventually give in. "User are hungry for content, Rosen says, "and they're going to get that content whether its from Pirate Bay or the (legitimate) source." Eventually, he believes, the content producers will wake up and tap into the online market.]
See Also:
Tags: boxee tv apple netflix version
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
I4U News ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:40 PM
Posted on 11/01/08 at 04:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Intel Software Network Blogs ) I read it on 11/04/08 at 11:40 AM
Posted on 10/31/08 at 09:17 PM
|
Last week Steve Jobs, in that special way he has of tossing out little random nuggets of chaos into the industry, basically said that Apple already had a netbook out there called the iPhone. As a rabid iPhone and netbook user, I called Shenanigans.
Then a series of articles at What's On iPhone made me stop and give it some more thought. The lines between smartphones, iPhone, netbooks, and all the rest grow increasingly fuzzy, so maybe I jumped the gun on my assessment. I spent some time really thinking about how I used each, and decided that the three features of my netbooks that I value the most are:
Portable: I can grab my netbook as I head out the door and don't need a backpack or messenger bag. Sometimes I'll even take it "just in case" I may need it, where I'll only grab my Macbook if I know for a fact I will need it along the way. Here the iPhone meets the criteria just fine. Even better, since I can't fit my Eee PC in my pant's pocket. Passed.
Powerful: I used to have a Windows Mobile phone and used it for basic phone calls, email, and in a pinch maybe getting some information off the internet (which is NOT the same as just web surfing). As I've noted before, I barely use my iPhone for the "phone" part of it at all. I use it for email, games, notes, information, and nearly normal web surfing on occasion. It's a very powerful little device. Passed.
Functional: Here's where the wheels come off. For all the power in my iPhone, I just can't get at like I need to for many things. For example, I type more on my iPhone than I did on my smartphone, but I'm still not writing a big blog post. Nor am I preparing a presentation, reviewing lots of data, or building anything complex. It's both an input (no keyboard) and output (screen size) issue. It's not a bad thing by itself, but it just limits the use cases for which the iPhone is a solution. I can't put typed data in at a reasonable speed, and the zoom and pan of the iPhone just isn't enough for even mildly complicated work I do on a netbook. Significant Fail.
So I stand by my calling of Shenanigans. The iPhone has a lot going for it, but it is not and never will satisfy the needs of netbook users. Personally, I'm hoping Mr. Jobs was just stalling because judging by the number of people out there attempting to get OSX running on existing netbooks, if Apple ever came out with their own netbook (Macbooklette? Macnetbook? Netmac?) I wouldn't be standing in line to buy one all by myself.
Tags: iphone netbook need netbooks even
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Eee PC - Blog ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:42 PM
Posted on 10/31/08 at 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
UMPCPortal ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:40 PM
Posted on 10/31/08 at 02:11 PM
|
Remember my in-tent Samsung Q1 Ultra test? 9hrs battery life on the Samsung Q1 with 25% backlight? An average drain of 6.9 watts. It was impressive and since I blew up the Q1 Ultra doing some solar-charging tests, I've been missing those 5, 6 and 7hr figures. I was just getting over the trauma until I read this article about another Samsung Mobile product with great battery life.
Notebook Magazine have just done a full set of battery life tests on the NC10 Netbook and it looks like Samsung have once again worked their magic. The tests included continuous Wifi-on web browsing in battery saving mode which is a very reasonable test to be doing. Far better than the misleading 2001 Jeita test and much more real-life' than the Battery Eater Pro turn everything and and run it at full-steam' approach. The NC10 returned
- 12% screen brightness: 7hrs 34mins representing an average drain of about 7.6w which is just a little bit more than what I saw on the Q1 Ultra.
- 50% screen brightness, the duration dropped to 6hrs 30mins which is an average 8.7W.
- 100% screen brightness, the test result reduced to 4hrs 38 minutes which is 12.3 watts drain.
More after the break
What it highlights is something I've been saying for years. The CPU power drain is not the most important element in determining a devices overall efficiency. In these 10" screens, even the latest LED technology backlight can take a lot of drain. In this case, nearly 5W at full power which is nearly 50% of the total power drain of the whole PC! Obviously, as screens get smaller, the LED power required drops and when you get to a 4.8" screen, you'll see 1-1.5W average drain. If you were to attache that Samsung battery to the Aigo MID, you would see close to 20 hours battery life under similar conditions as the Wifi-on drain is about 3W.
As we move to lower and lower power processors, screens and other components need to follow and the OEM that has access to the best components and the best engineers is always going to have an advantage. Samsung keep proving that.
So how's the rest of the NC10? I was watching a live session at EeePCnews.de a few evenings ago and it was clear that people are really interested in this one. 3000 people watched Sascha, the lead guy there, do live testing and as the session went on you could almost sense people hitting the buy button as Sascha reported positive comment after positive comment! LaptopMag calls it their netbook of choice' right now. From what I've seen, I have no reason to doubt it.
Samsung NC10 links and info in the product database.

Tags: drain samsung battery life nc
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Eee PC - Blog ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:42 PM
Posted on 10/30/08 at 03:12 PM
|
HP is mulling the idea of offering their latest netbooks, the Mini 1000 bundled with various mobile data plans in the hope of sparking more interests and eventually sales to their netbooks. According to are report by the Wall Street Journal, HP is sort of overwhelmed by the growing popularity of the netbooks that they are looking into the possibility of selling off their Mini Note netbooks together with various data plans. This fits well with the idea of internet mobility in the true sense of the word.
The plan is hot on the heels of the just announced new models of the HP netbook - the HP Mini 1000, HP Mini 1000 Vivienne Tam Edition and the Mini 700.
If you're not in the loop, some countries in Europe and Asia are fond of doing this kind of marketing strategy to gain market leverage for their netbook. And with the rising cost of prices, it is but natural for consumers to look into great buys and deals before they proceed with the transaction.
So, HP's plans of bundling up their HP Mini Note netbook with mobile carriers' data plans seem to be a logical strategy.
Via WSJ
A post from the Asus Eee PC blog.
HP Plans to Offer its Netbook via US Mobile Data Plan Bundle
Tags: hp plans mini data netbook
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Portfolio.com: Tech Observer ) I read it on 10/28/08 at 09:36 PM
Posted on 10/28/08 at 08:52 PM
|
Kevin Maney writes: Who knew a stinkin' cloud could get get so crowded. But here comes Microsoft stomping into cloud computing, instantly taking up space like a 300-pound guy in a middle seat.
But this whole thing is getting confusing, especially since cloud computing seems to be a bunch of different markets, not just one. IBM, for instance, announced Blue Cloud a year ago. It's aimed at big corporate customers that want to offload some data center operations to IBM -- and really, IBM has been doing that for years. Blue Cloud just sounds like a way to brand it.
Amazon.com seems to be the clear leader in a new generation of cloud computing that CEO Jeff Bezos calls "computing by the sip." Bezos started putting this in place in 2006, and it's become an important solution for Silicon Valley start-ups. They're able to build Web-based businesses without buying or leasing a roomful of servers. The flexibility is a godsend. The companies buy a little computing when they're starting, and more as business ramps up. Amazon seems to still be trying to convince more stodgy corporations to use its cloud services.
So if IBM has the big companies and Amazon the small ones -- where does Microsoft fit in? Well, first of all, it's just adding to the confusion by calling its offering Microsoft Azure, which is, you know, a purplish blue. So we've got IBM's Blue Cloud, and Microsoft's Purplish Blue Cloud. Who wants to jump in with the Mauve Cloud?
Microsoft seems intent on offering applications that reside on the Web and communicate and synch with apps running on PCs. Which, if I'm reading this right, is not really competing with either Amazon or IBM -- but is more in line with things like Sun's Star Office and Google's apps such as Google Docs. But even there, it seems that Microsoft is aiming at corporate customers with high-powered apps, while Google is more of a consumer or small business offering...and Star Office sits somewhere in between.
Related Links Google Extends Web Search Lead H-P Buying EDS With Its Head in the Clouds Google to Microsoft: Game On

Tags: cloud microsoft ibm blue computing
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Liliputing ) I read it on 10/28/08 at 12:52 PM
Posted on 10/28/08 at 04:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Liliputing ) I read it on 10/28/08 at 12:52 PM
Posted on 10/28/08 at 02:59 PM
|


Sure, Asus may have promised to add the Splashtop instant on interface to every computer with an Asus motherboard. But it looks like Lenovo is going to beat Asus to the punch when it comes to adding Splashtop to netbooks. Today the company announed it's working with DeviceVM, the company behind Splashtop to add the interface to the lenovo IdeaPad S10e netbook.
According the press release, the S10e is now shipping. But it looks like this particular model is aimed at educational markets, not consumers. So it's not clear if and when you'll be able to pick up an S10 with Splashtop preloaded.
The IdeaPad S10e is available with Windows XP Home, or SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop, and comes with either a 4GB SSD or a hard drive with up to 160GB of storage.
SplashTop software basically lets you boot a light weight operating system in a matter of seconds which gives you quick access to frequently used applications like Firefox, Skype, and Picasa. If those are the apps you plan to use, you can boot your system in around 5-10 seconds instead of waiting 30-60 seconds for a full Windows or Linux desktop to boot up.
In related news, when I checked the Lenovo IdeaPad S10 order page to see if there was any information about Splashtop (which will actually be called QuickStart on Lenovo machines), I noted that Lenovo has apparently cut the price of the red S10 model by $20. At $409, it's stil $10 more than the white or black models, but it's cheaper than it was last week.
Via Eee PC.net / Image credit: Engadget
Post from: Liliputing
Tags: splashtop lenovo s e ideapad
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Eee PC - Blog ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:42 PM
Posted on 10/27/08 at 11:44 PM
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|