 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
(via -
MobileCrunch ) I read it on 02/16/10 at 12:22 AM
Posted on 02/16/10 at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Eee PC - Blog ) I read it on 01/31/10 at 06:44 PM
Posted on 01/31/10 at 03:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
TechStartups.com ) I read it on 01/12/10 at 09:06 PM
Posted on 01/12/10 at 03:28 PM
|
By Senior Editor Kris Smith (@croncast)
Intel wanted to knock the socks of CES attendees this year with its booth and found a great way to succeed.
They created Infoscape, a massive 7 1/2 foot square double HD (4k) partial cube with custom software to pull XML feeds in real-time and display them as a series of hundreds to thousands of rotating cubes.
They didn't stop there, however. They swung for the fences by adding interactivity with the two walls by integrating touch. Anyone could come up to the wall and touch the cubes to trigger the selection of that cube's content.
The best way to describe it would be that it was like clicking a photo online and having it popup in a lightbox with a transparent background, but with many open at once.
It turns out that this was only a display element for the booth and not a real product. The intention was highlight the i7 processor. This chip has over 600 million transistors on it and is the size of a dime. One single chip powered both screens.
3D wishes it had the juice that this wall did. If this wall were the future of television I'd feel a whole lot better about what Samsung, Panasonic and Sony were shilling.
This thing just goes to show that sometimes the best products are accidents. Look for Intel to find other uses for Infoscape this year.
Related articles by Zemanta
Intel Touch Wall Infoscape #CES is a post from: TechStartups.com
Tags: infoscape , intel ces , intel i7 ces , intel i7 infoscape , intel infoscape , intel touch wall , touch wall ces 
Tags: intel infoscape ces wall touch
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
MobileCrunch ) I read it on 07/22/09 at 03:18 PM
Posted on 07/22/09 at 07:27 PM
|

Its taken a bit longer than we all might have hoped, but it seems that Android is really starting to pick up the steam it deserves. Be it Samsung, LG, Sony Ericsson.. if they're a big gun in the mobile manufacturing world (Well, outside of certain obvious exclusions), they're probably working on an Android handset or two. The first off the bat and the most dedicated so far has been HTC - and if the latest rumors hold true, they might be looking to throw even more weight behind it.
According to the Digitimes, HTC may be looking to put the Droid onto as much as fifty percent of their handsets. Now, HTC doesn't push'em out as fast as some other manufacturers (by the way, Samsung, we're totally talking about you), but they still pump out a good number of'em each year. And of their lineup, almost the entirety is Windows Mobile. Digitimes also adds that HTC is aiming for around 30% of their handsets this year to be Android-based. We can think of about 5 or 6 we're expecting to see by years end (including those that have launched already) -f it that's 30% and HTC continues to make around as many total devices next year, we can probably expect at least 9 or 10 Droidphones from them next year. Fuzzy math? Absolutely. But we can hope, can't we?
[Via EngadgetMobile]
Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it's time for you to find a new Job2.0
Tags: htc year android probably mobile
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Techmeme ) I read it on 06/01/09 at 09:26 AM
Posted on 06/01/09 at 12:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
UMPCPortal ) I read it on 11/01/08 at 08:40 PM
Posted on 10/31/08 at 02:11 PM
|
Remember my in-tent Samsung Q1 Ultra test? 9hrs battery life on the Samsung Q1 with 25% backlight? An average drain of 6.9 watts. It was impressive and since I blew up the Q1 Ultra doing some solar-charging tests, I've been missing those 5, 6 and 7hr figures. I was just getting over the trauma until I read this article about another Samsung Mobile product with great battery life.
Notebook Magazine have just done a full set of battery life tests on the NC10 Netbook and it looks like Samsung have once again worked their magic. The tests included continuous Wifi-on web browsing in battery saving mode which is a very reasonable test to be doing. Far better than the misleading 2001 Jeita test and much more real-life' than the Battery Eater Pro turn everything and and run it at full-steam' approach. The NC10 returned
- 12% screen brightness: 7hrs 34mins representing an average drain of about 7.6w which is just a little bit more than what I saw on the Q1 Ultra.
- 50% screen brightness, the duration dropped to 6hrs 30mins which is an average 8.7W.
- 100% screen brightness, the test result reduced to 4hrs 38 minutes which is 12.3 watts drain.
More after the break
What it highlights is something I've been saying for years. The CPU power drain is not the most important element in determining a devices overall efficiency. In these 10" screens, even the latest LED technology backlight can take a lot of drain. In this case, nearly 5W at full power which is nearly 50% of the total power drain of the whole PC! Obviously, as screens get smaller, the LED power required drops and when you get to a 4.8" screen, you'll see 1-1.5W average drain. If you were to attache that Samsung battery to the Aigo MID, you would see close to 20 hours battery life under similar conditions as the Wifi-on drain is about 3W.
As we move to lower and lower power processors, screens and other components need to follow and the OEM that has access to the best components and the best engineers is always going to have an advantage. Samsung keep proving that.
So how's the rest of the NC10? I was watching a live session at EeePCnews.de a few evenings ago and it was clear that people are really interested in this one. 3000 people watched Sascha, the lead guy there, do live testing and as the session went on you could almost sense people hitting the buy button as Sascha reported positive comment after positive comment! LaptopMag calls it their netbook of choice' right now. From what I've seen, I have no reason to doubt it.
Samsung NC10 links and info in the product database.

Tags: drain samsung battery life nc
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
jkOnTheRun ) I read it on 10/28/08 at 09:34 PM
Posted on 10/28/08 at 11:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Gizmodo ) I read it on 09/25/08 at 12:36 PM
Posted on 09/25/08 at 03:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Gizmodo ) I read it on 07/13/08 at 12:00 PM
Posted on 07/13/08 at 03:20 PM
|
If the rumor mill is correct, Samsung is cooking up a new Symbian S60 slider dubbed the i8510 with some serious specs under the hoodincluding an 8 megapixel camera. The full list of specs are impressive, and would definitely pose a threat to the upcoming Nokia N96 if it is the real deal. The full list of specs are as follows: 2.8-inch QVGA (240320 pixels), 16m colors 8 megapixel camera with auto-focus, xenon flash and 120 fps video recording UMTS with HSDPA support, WiFi, GPS, TV out, DivX support, dedicated 3D graphics chip Optical mouse (same as i780 and i900 Omnia) 200 mAh battery 106.553.916.9 mm metal case 16 GB internal memory (possibly an 8 GB version as well) Impressive. Conflicting reports have the i8510 running either Feature Pack 1 or 2 and there is no word on whether we are talking tri-band or quad-band GSM here. However, as with any rumor, we will just have to wait and see what holds true. [Forum2 via Estato via IntoMobile via BGR]

Tags: i specs via samsung megapixel
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(via -
Techdirt ) I read it on 01/25/08 at 12:10 PM
Posted on 01/25/08 at 05:21 PM
|
This past Tuesday, the US Patent and Trademark Office issued a patent on "a mobile entertainment and communication device." Reading the patent, you realize it describes the quite common smartphone. It's a patent for a mobile phone with removable storage, an internet connection, a camera and the ability to download audio or video files. The patent holding firm who has the rights to this patent wasted no time at all. At 12:01am Tuesday morning, it filed three separate lawsuits against just about everyone you can think of, including Apple, Nokia, RIM, Sprint, AT&T, HP, Motorola, Helio, HTC, Sony Ericsson, UTStarcomm, Samsung and a bunch of others. Amusingly, the company actually first filed the lawsuits on Monday, but realized it was jumping the gun and pulled them, only to refile just past the stroke of midnight.
As the link above explains, the patent itself is based on a bunch of continuation filings, which are commonly used by patent holders who want broad patents to cover the latest technologies well after they've already come about in the market. It would seem like the concept itself, merely combining a bunch of things that people were already talking about, should never have been granted based on the Supreme Court's recent KSR ruling that merely combining existing concepts doesn't deserve a patent. Also, as noted in the comments to the link above, it would appear that there's a fair amount of prior art. In fact, Apple even sent over some prior art concerning the patent just before it was originally supposed to be issued last summer -- but somehow patent holder's lawyers talked their way around it. In the meantime, it looks like we've got yet another case of an overly broad and obvious patent being used against a huge number of firms. I'm sure that's exactly what Thomas Jefferson expected when he created our patent system.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
Tags: patent issued bunch apple comments
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|